Iter Consulting and AIMMS announce new report, Trump’s Trade Tightrope: A Global Supply Chain Outlook

Unveiling Risks and Opportunities in a Volatile Trade Landscape

London – As Donald Trump begins his second presidential term, global supply chains face seismic shifts driven by anticipated trade tariff policies. Iter Consulting and AIMMS have released a landmark report, Trump’s Trade Tightrope: A Global Supply Chain Outlook, revealing critical vulnerabilities and actionable strategies for navigating an increasingly fragmented trade landscape.

Based on insights from 1,000 senior supply chain and manufacturing leaders across the US, UK, China, Germany, and Sweden, the report analyses over 60,000 data points to provide a comprehensive view of the macroeconomic themes shaping supply chain resilience.

Key Market Insights

United States: Limited Preparedness Amid Rising Risks

  • 38% of US companies are only somewhat prepared for trade policy changes, relying on suppliers to absorb increased tariff costs. This leaves them vulnerable to unplanned cost surges and supply chain disruptions if suppliers pass on tariff related costs.
  • Responding to expected increased tariffs, only 8% of US firms would invest in developing onshore manufacturing, underscoring limited domestic production growth. The shift to alternative manufacturing hubs like Vietnam and Cambodia continues to accelerate.
  • NASDAQ-listed tech giants are heavily reliant on Taiwanese semiconductors, creating a severe risk from geopolitical tensions. A Taiwan conflict could cripple US tech manufacturing and send chip costs soaring and the tech-heavy NASDAQ tumbling.
  • 62% of US firms rank tariffs as a high risk but lack diversified supplier networks, exposing them to supply chain shocks. Advanced scenario planning and proactive supplier diversification are critical to mitigating these risks.

China: Strategic Preparedness But Economic Headwinds

  • 43% of Chinese companies report being “very prepared” for trade tariff changes, far surpassing the preparedness of US firms. Chinese manufacturers are leveraging strategies like nearshoring in Mexico and rerouting exports through Belt and Road nations to mitigate tariff impacts.
  • 39% of Chinese firms cite the domestic economic slowdown as their primary risk, overshadowing concerns about tariffs. Prolonged economic stagnation threatens long-term growth and resilience.
  • Anticipated tariffs are expected to redirect Chinese exports towards lower-tariff markets in Europe and Asia, reducing US access to critical manufacturing supplies. This shift could disrupt US production lines and drive-up costs for consumers.
  • In response to tariff challenges, Chinese firms are likely to adopt aggressive pricing strategies, such as stock dumping in alternative western markets. This tactic risks destabilising industries reliant on balanced pricing, as previously seen in the solar panel sector.

Germany: Overconfidence in Export Models

  • 48% of German manufacturers anticipate minimal tariff impacts, requiring only moderate operational adjustments. However, this outlook ignores potential vulnerabilities in export-heavy industries such as automotive and pharmaceuticals.
  • Germany’s €63.3bn trade surplus with the US faces significant challenges under proposed 20% tariffs. Overconfidence in the current export-driven model risks long-term economic disruption.
  • Despite geopolitical risks like the war in Ukraine (which Germany is financing), 39% of German firms expect low or no impact from geopolitical risks, reflecting a lack of contingency planning. This leaves businesses exposed to sudden cost increases and supply chain interruptions.
  • Automotive exports, which account for around 15% of Germany’s US-bound exports, are particularly vulnerable to tariff escalations, threatening a cornerstone of the German economy.

United Kingdom: Reactive, Not Proactive

  • 51% of UK manufacturers are not planning to adjust sourcing strategies in response to trade policy changes, highlighting a reactive stance that risks costly supply chain disruptions.
  • The reliance on maritime routes—used by 90% of UK trade—exposes manufacturers to geopolitical hotspots vulnerable to conflict.
  • In response to tariff increases, 25% of UK companies would increase domestic sourcing, but local suppliers are likely to elevate production costs, eroding already thin profit margins.
  • The US remains the UK’s largest export market, accounting for £188.2bn annually. New tariffs could strain key industries like pharmaceuticals and petroleum, making diversification of export markets and contingency planning essential.

Sweden: Proactive Adaptation Amid Optimism

  • 56% of Swedish manufacturers are set to change sourcing strategies in response to trade policy changes to reduce dependency on tariff-impacted regions, positioning themselves for greater resilience.
  • However, 39% of Swedish companies remain overly optimistic, expecting minimal tariff impacts. This confidence could mask future vulnerabilities, particularly in industries reliant on US trade.
  • The shift towards onshoring is gaining momentum among Swedish manufacturers, offering a hedge against future trade disruptions.
  • A projected 16% drop in Swedish exports to the US due to increased tariffs underscores the need for diversified trade strategies to avoid overreliance on Nordic and EU markets.

Research Methodology

The study surveyed 1,000 senior leaders in December 2024 across the US, UK, China, Germany, and Sweden. It explores tariff-driven risks, emerging manufacturing trends, and innovative strategies to bolster supply chain resilience. Over 60,000 data points were analysed, supported by expert commentary and actionable insights tailored to each market.

Download The Full Report

Download the Full Report Here: Trump’s Trade Tightrope

About the author
TrustedParts x A