The winds of geopolitical change are whipping across the European landscape, forcing a fundamental reassessment of the continent’s security posture. For too long, perhaps, European nations have relied on the transatlantic security umbrella, but recent events and pronouncements from across the Atlantic have triggered a palpable shift. As Ursula von der Leyen, head of the European Commission, recently stated: “something fundamental has shifted”. Indeed, in these increasingly “transactional” times, the very foundations of European security are being re-examined.
SOURCE: Astute Group Market Intel blog
Von der Leyen’s pronouncements come alongside a bold initiative: the ‘ReArm Europe’ programme, a plan aiming to mobilise a staggering €800 billion for defence. This is not small change. As the International Institute for Fiscal Studies (IIFS) notes, European defence spending already saw record growth last year, increasing by almost 12%. Yet, driven by concerns over transatlantic reliability and the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, the appetite for further dramatic increases is clear. “Nothing is off the table,” Von der Leyen declared, when questioned on the specifics of funding mechanisms, indicating a willingness to consider even previously unthinkable options such as joint borrowing – a move that would require a significant shift in German fiscal policy.
Germany, traditionally cautious on such matters, is showing signs of movement. Friedrich Merz, the incoming centre-right chancellor, has hinted at amending the nation’s constitution to enable greater defence spending. This potential change of heart in Berlin is crucial, as Germany’s fiscal stance often dictates the broader EU trajectory. Other nations are also stepping up. The UK has committed to a significant budget increase, Denmark is establishing a dedicated defence ‘Acceleration Fund’, and Belgium is reportedly accelerating its own spending plans.
But where will this money come from? Goldman Sachs Research suggests that even a 0.5% of GDP increase in EU defence spending could boost the economy, with every €100 spent potentially adding €50 to GDP over two years. However, funding these ambitious plans presents complex fiscal challenges. Von der Leyen has proposed utilising the “escape clause” in EU fiscal rules to allow member states greater leeway on deficits. Other options on the table include establishing dedicated off-budget funds, increasing taxation, or even diverting funds from other public spending areas – hard choices as the IIFS points out, potentially impacting areas like pensions and healthcare.
Furthermore, there’s a push to unlock private sector investment in defence. As Dutch Secretary General Murk Rutte implored, it’s time to tell banks and pension funds that “investing in defence is an investment in our security”. This requires overcoming the perception that defence investment clashes with ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) standards – a significant hurdle given current investment trends.
Italian manufacturer Leonardo is already anticipating a €6.6 billion “upside” from this new wave of European defence spending, highlighting the potential for industrial growth and “stronger alliances” as CEO Roberto Cingolani puts it. Indeed, Leonardo forecasts a substantial rise in orders over the next five years, driven by this rearmament drive.
The commitment to bolstering defence is undeniable. The path to funding it, however, remains complex and multifaceted, requiring both fiscal creativity and political will. One thing is clear: European defence spending is no longer constrained by old orthodoxies, and the implications for both security and the European economy will be significant in the years to come.
Thousands of senior engineers and procurement professionals subscribe to our LinkedIn Market Intel newsletter – get yours here
For more help with looking at supply chain options, contact Astute Electronics
